Here we illustrate how the components of MACE are related.
Don’t forget that to enable Transformation, each is represented at different
levels of Idealisation/Realisation.
At the core are the Methods which execute within the Culture
and Environment that exists, with the whole existing within a context.
The Methods break down into Phases and Disciplines and it is
these Disciplines that are utilised to varying degrees in each phase which act
upon the Artefacts to varying degrees.
The Operating Model for the domain in question equates to
the Contextual level information which defines an abstract representation of
how the Methods, Artefacts, Culture and Environmental things come together to
accomplish its function.
In your Enterprise, where are
the Operating Models defined for Direction, Operations, Transformation and
Do they cover all areas?
If you mapped them to MACE,
would there be any overlaps or gaps?
If so, would there be any
benefit in removing them?
How would you do that?