Laying that out in a way that is probably more recognisable,
we can see the familiar rows and columns of Maturity Models.
However, it is almost certain that the ones you have seen in
the past have (as shown with a red border):
Only defined these things in terms of Methods (processes) and not
in terms of Artefacts, Environment and Culture.
Only defined the Measures (aka evidence) and allowed for the
creation of an Assessment and not the rest of the Transformational information.
One might argue that the things which are missing in most
existing Maturity Models (Artefacts, Culture, Environment and Motivation,
Actions, Guidance) are the things of most value! All these things are included
in all Pragmatic Ontologies and Frameworks.