How was Training?

more

“As someone new to EA it was very informative.” - senior business analyst, Board of Equalization, USA, Jan 2015

Recommend PEAF?

more

“Yes - Makes conceptual thinking practical” - Solution Architect, B/CAO, Netherlands, Feb 2015







They say that time is a great healer. But time is also a great destroyer. Time is the main problem when trying to justify the changes (and therefore the investment) required to adopt and utilise The Architecture Paradigm™.

As with anything, there is a time lapse between making the investment in utilising The Architecture Paradigm™ and reaping its benefits. This is because just making the changes required to utilise The Architecture Paradigm™ creates no benefit in and of itself. The benefits of spending the money making those changes only come from the use of those changes as time progresses.

The worst mistake people make when thinking about and justifying the use of The Architecture Paradigm™ is that their expectations of short term value are too high and their expectations of long term value are too low. In reality, short term value is much less than expected but long term value is much higher than expected. In fact the curve is more of an S shape where initially there is a slight decrease in value (when adopting anything new) then a slow increase in value, followed by an abrupt increase in value, followed by a return to a more linear increase in value over time as maximum value is achieved.

Justification for The Architecture Paradigm™ cannot be based on the benefit of the next project or even the next two, three or four projects. In fact, the next project (and possibly the second and third projects) may well run slower and cost more money. This is the Chasm of Procrastination.

Many people think (incorrectly) that justifying use of The Architecture Paradigm™ is as easy (and should be as easy) as justifying whether to buy a kettle or not - buy a kettle today, get the benefit tomorrow. In actuality, justifying an investment in adopting or becoming more mature in your use of The Architecture Paradigm™ is more akin to justifying spending 30K on going to university for four years where you gain zero benefit for four years and at the end of the four years there is still no immediate benefit and no guarantee that you will a) get a job or b) that even if you do get a job, you will earn more than what you would be earning if you had not saved 30K and gained four years of experience instead. Another example might be buying insurance, having to pay and pay and pay for something that you many never actually use or get any benefit from whatsoever.

 

Do people in your Enterprise expect Architecture to have immediate benefit?

What will you do to explain it doesn’t?

What will you do to explain that benefits come down the line?

Do you want to accept the risk of not using The Architecture Paradigm™?

Is the Management of your Enterprise in the Chasm of Procrastination™?

 

◄◄◄ Previous Page          

          Next Page ►►►










 

© 2008-2016 Pragmatic EA Ltd