How was Training?

more

Intense and in all parts applyable to my own organization. - Enterprise Architect, Malmo, Sweden, Oct 2013

Recommend PEAF?

more

Yes - Much better model for learning EA than others due to simplicity of design versus convoluted other models. Anyone of reasonable intelligence can pick it up and leanr it, while other frameworks have an overly ritualized system and often require a heavy IT backgroudn to understand. - consultant, Flynn Enterprise Management, USA, May 2010

  Introduction   Context   Methods   Artefacts   Culture   Environment   Adoption  

Desktop

Mobile

 

<< Previous <<

>> Next >>

From the perspective of the entire Transformation domain, Architecture is performed more at the top of the stack and less at the bottom. Conversely Engineering is performed more at the bottom of the stack and less at the top.

The further down the stack we go the more concrete things become, and the further up the stack we go, the more abstract things become. This does not mean we are saying that there is no Engineering happening at the top and there is no Architecture happening at the bottom.

 

Does your Enterprise recognise that people working towards the top of the Transformation stack are more Architects than Engineers?

Does your Enterprise recognise that people working towards the bottom of the Transformation stack are more Engineers than Architects?

If not, does this create any problems?

Does this create any opportunities for education?

 

 

2008-2016 Pragmatic EA Ltd