How was Training?

more

I found the style of instruction to be supportive and informative. Kevin's spent time ensuring that each person attending the course understood the concepts and materials, not glossing over aspects that may be hard for us as a company or "selling" a prod - VP Portfolio Management, PPDI, USA, Sep 2010

Recommend PEAF?

more

Yes - PEAF improves application of EA form a the practical perspective. - Enterprise Architect, Ministry of Awqaf , Kuwait, Jan 2015

  Introduction   Context   Methods   Artefacts   Culture   Environment   Adoption  

Desktop

Mobile




 

<< Previous <<

>> Next >>

The Enterprise Business Motivation Model (EBMM v3.5 - Nick Malik) is interesting because it attempts to define entities in both the Structural and Transformational areas, although again it only covers the higher levels. It was formed from OMG's BMM by Microsoft's Internal EA team and is influenced by the writings of well-known authors like Geary Rummler, Alan Brache, and Alexander Osterwalder.

With respect to Structure:

      Business Capability and Business Process come under the Methods domain of MACE.

      Data Object comes under the Artefacts domain of MACE (unless Data Objects are being used to perform the Methods, in which case they could come under Environment)

      Business Unit comes under the Culture domain of MACE.

      Application comes under the Environment domain of MACE (unless Applications are being produced by the Methods, in which case they could come under Artefacts)

With respect to Transformation:

      Business, Business Model and Driver come under the Motivation domain in MAGMA (although the Principles sub area really sits under Guidance).

      Initiative comes under the Actions domain in MAGMA.

      Assessment comes under the Assessment domain in MAGMA.

      Influencer and Directive come under the Guidance domain of MAGMA (which as previously stated should also include Principles).

 

Do you know of any other meta-models which define both Structural and Transformational information in an integrated way?

Are the meta-models you use integrated, if not what problems are likely to result?

How do you integrate Structural and Transformational artefacts?

If you don't, does it cause problems that your Structural and Transformational artefacts are not related?




 

2008-2016 Pragmatic EA Ltd